Bruno Tilz 304-H1 vs Schilke 38D

The Bruno Tilz 304-H1 has a wider cup diameter.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 304-H1
    • Baritone / Euphonium
    Catalog
    Cup diameter22.00 mm / 0.8661 in
    Cup depthMedium
    Rim width
    Throat diameter4.40 mm / 0.1732 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Schilke 38D
      • Baritone / Euphonium
      Cup diameter19.73 mm / 0.7768 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material

      Cup Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 304-H1 has a cup diameter of 22.00 mm / 0.8661 in compared to 19.73 mm / 0.7768 in on the Schilke 38D — a difference of 2.27 mm / 0.0894 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      Both mouthpieces share a medium cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 304-H1 details Schilke 38D details Bruno Tilz 304-H1 equivalents Schilke 38D equivalents