Bruno Tilz 309-D 3 vs Denis Wick 2SL

the Denis Wick 2SL has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 309-D 3
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Cup diameter32.00 mm / 1.2598 in
    Cup depthShallow
    Rim width
    Throat diameter6.80 mm / 0.2677 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Denis Wick 2SL
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter32.00 mm / 1.2598 in
      Cup depthShallow
      Rim width7.73 mm / 0.3043 in
      Throat diameter8.45 mm / 0.3327 in
      Backboreopen
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      Both mouthpieces have virtually identical cup diameters at 32.00 mm / 1.2598 in.

      Cup Depth

      Both mouthpieces share a shallow cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

      Throat Diameter

      The Denis Wick 2SL has a wider throat (8.45 mm / 0.3327 in vs 6.80 mm / 0.2677 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 309-D 3 details Denis Wick 2SL details Bruno Tilz 309-D 3 equivalents Denis Wick 2SL equivalents