Bruno Tilz 310-M 0 vs Yamaha BB-67C4

The Bruno Tilz 310-M 0 has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 310-M 0 features a deeper cup, the Bruno Tilz 310-M 0 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 310-M 0
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Cup diameter33.70 mm / 1.3268 in
    Cup depthDeep
    Rim width
    Throat diameter8.30 mm / 0.3268 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Yamaha BB-67C4
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter32.06 mm / 1.2622 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter8.10 mm / 0.3189 in
      BackboreStandard
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 310-M 0 has a cup diameter of 33.70 mm / 1.3268 in compared to 32.06 mm / 1.2622 in on the Yamaha BB-67C4 — a difference of 1.64 mm / 0.0646 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Bruno Tilz 310-M 0 has a deep cup while the Yamaha BB-67C4 has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Throat Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 310-M 0 has a wider throat (8.30 mm / 0.3268 in vs 8.10 mm / 0.3189 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 310-M 0 details Yamaha BB-67C4 details Bruno Tilz 310-M 0 equivalents Yamaha BB-67C4 equivalents