Bruno Tilz 310-M 29 vs Denis Wick 1L

the Denis Wick 1L features a deeper cup, the Denis Wick 1L has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 310-M 29
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Cup diameter32.50 mm / 1.2795 in
    Cup depthDeep
    Rim width
    Throat diameter8.40 mm / 0.3307 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Denis Wick 1L
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter32.50 mm / 1.2795 in
      Cup depthVery deep
      Rim width7.48 mm / 0.2945 in
      Throat diameter8.43 mm / 0.3319 in
      Backboreopen
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      Both mouthpieces have virtually identical cup diameters at 32.50 mm / 1.2795 in.

      Cup Depth

      The Denis Wick 1L has a very deep cup while the Bruno Tilz 310-M 29 has a deep cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Throat Diameter

      The Denis Wick 1L has a wider throat (8.43 mm / 0.3319 in vs 8.40 mm / 0.3307 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 310-M 29 details Denis Wick 1L details Bruno Tilz 310-M 29 equivalents Denis Wick 1L equivalents