Home › Tuba › Bruno Tilz 310-M 9 vs Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight)

Bruno Tilz 310-M 9 vs Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight)

the Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 310-M 9
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Cup diameter32.00 mm / 1.2598 in
    Cup depthShallow
    Rim width—
    Throat diameter7.80 mm / 0.3071 in
    Backbore—
    Finish—
    Material—
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight)
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter—
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width—
      Throat diameter—
      Backbore—
      Finish—
      Material—

      Cup Depth

      The Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) has a medium cup while the Bruno Tilz 310-M 9 has a shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 310-M 9 details Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) details Bruno Tilz 310-M 9 equivalents Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) equivalents

      Compare Bruno Tilz 310-M 9 with others

      Compare Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) with others

      Popular Tuba comparisons

      Bruno Tilz vs Monette

      Browse by specification