Conn Harry Glanz 6M vs Curry 3 DC.

the Curry 3 DC. features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Conn Harry Glanz 6M
    • Cornet
    Lead
    Cup diameter
    Cup depthMedium
    Rim width
    Throat diameter
    Backbore
    Finish
    MaterialSilver-plated brass
    Best suited for
    📋Harry Glanz signature model 6M
    🎶Lead/commercial; endorsed by Harry Glanz
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Curry 3 DC.
      • Cornet
      Cup diameter16.89 mm / 0.6650 in
      Cup depthVery deep
      Rim width
      Throat diameter3.81 mm / 0.1500 in
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Depth

      The Curry 3 DC. has a very deep cup while the Conn Harry Glanz 6M has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Material

      The Conn Harry Glanz 6M is described as Silver-plated brass, and the Curry 3 DC. as unspecified. Material affects mass, warmth, and how quickly the piece responds.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Conn Harry Glanz 6M details Curry 3 DC. details Conn Harry Glanz 6M equivalents Curry 3 DC. equivalents