Conn Harry Glanz 6M vs Denis Wick RW3
the Denis Wick RW3 features a deeper cup.
Mouthpiece A
Conn Harry Glanz 6M
• Cornet
LeadCup diameter—
Cup depthMedium
Rim width—
Throat diameter—
Backbore—
Finish—
MaterialSilver-plated brass
Best suited for
Harry Glanz signature model 6M
Lead/commercial; endorsed by Harry Glanz
vs
Mouthpiece B
Denis Wick RW3
• Cornet
Cup diameter16.75 mm / 0.6594 in
Cup depthVery deep
Rim width5.05 mm / 0.1988 in
Throat diameter4.57 mm / 0.1799 in
Backboreopen
Finish—
Material—
Best suited for
High-volume projection — open throat for power
Cup Depth
The Denis Wick RW3 has a very deep cup while the Conn Harry Glanz 6M has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.
Material
The Conn Harry Glanz 6M is described as Silver-plated brass, and the Denis Wick RW3 as unspecified. Material affects mass, warmth, and how quickly the piece responds.
Which is better?
Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.