Conn Harry Glanz 9M vs Denis Wick 4B

Both mouthpieces share similar core dimensions — the differences are in the details.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Conn Harry Glanz 9M
    • Cornet
    Lead
    Cup diameter
    Cup depthMedium
    Rim width
    Throat diameter
    Backbore
    Finish
    MaterialSilver-plated brass
    Best suited for
    📋Harry Glanz signature model 9M
    🎶Lead/commercial; endorsed by Harry Glanz
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Denis Wick 4B
      • Cornet
      Cup diameter16.50 mm / 0.6496 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width5.17 mm / 0.2035 in
      Throat diameter4.27 mm / 0.1681 in
      BackboreV-type
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      🎵All-round versatile — balanced cup for general playing
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Depth

      Both mouthpieces share a medium cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

      Material

      The Conn Harry Glanz 9M is described as Silver-plated brass, and the Denis Wick 4B as unspecified. Material affects mass, warmth, and how quickly the piece responds.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Conn Harry Glanz 9M details Denis Wick 4B details Conn Harry Glanz 9M equivalents Denis Wick 4B equivalents