Home › Flugelhorn › Conn Precision 2 (Mello) vs GR Technologies E62FL

Conn Precision 2 (Mello) vs GR Technologies E62FL

the Conn Precision 2 (Mello) features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Conn Precision 2 (Mello)
    • Flugelhorn
    General
    Cup diameter—
    Cup depthDeep
    Rim width—
    Throat diameter—
    Backbore—
    Finish—
    MaterialSilver-plated brass
    Best suited for
    📋Mellophone
    🎶Shallow cup; brighter tone
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      GR Technologies E62FL
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter15.75 mm / 0.6201 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width—
      Throat diameter—
      Backbore—
      Finish—
      Material—

      Cup Depth

      The Conn Precision 2 (Mello) has a deep cup while the GR Technologies E62FL has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Material

      The Conn Precision 2 (Mello) is described as Silver-plated brass, and the GR Technologies E62FL as unspecified. Material affects mass, warmth, and how quickly the piece responds.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Conn Precision 2 (Mello) details GR Technologies E62FL details Conn Precision 2 (Mello) equivalents GR Technologies E62FL equivalents

      Compare Conn Precision 2 (Mello) with others

      Compare GR Technologies E62FL with others

      Popular Flugelhorn comparisons

      Conn vs GR Technologies

      Browse by specification