Curry 132DH vs Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight)
the Curry 132DH features a deeper cup.
Mouthpiece A
Curry 132DH
• Tuba
Cup diameter33.53 mm / 1.3200 in
Cup depthVery deep
Rim width—
Throat diameter8.23 mm / 0.3240 in
Backbore—
Finish—
Material—
Best suited for
Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
High-volume projection — open throat for power
vs
Mouthpiece B
Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight)
• Tuba
Cup diameter—
Cup depthMedium
Rim width—
Throat diameter—
Backbore—
Finish—
Material—
Cup Depth
The Curry 132DH has a very deep cup while the Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.
Which is better?
Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.
Compare Curry 132DH with others
Compare Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) with others
- Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) vs Bach 18
- Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) vs Yamaha BB-BOBO-SOLO-GP
- Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) vs Denis Wick 2L
- Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) vs Bruno Tilz 231-C 4
- Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) vs Monette Tuba 98 (Lightweight)
- Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) vs Marcinkiewicz CH W1