Denis Wick 2.5CC vs Kelly 25

The Denis Wick 2.5CC has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick 2.5CC features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Denis Wick 2.5CC
    • Tuba
    Cup diameter32.00 mm / 1.2598 in
    Cup depthDeep
    Rim width7.20 mm / 0.2835 in
    Throat diameter8.60 mm / 0.3386 in
    BackboreV-type
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Kelly 25
      • Tuba
      General
      Cup diameter30.99 mm / 1.2201 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter
      BackboreM
      Finish
      MaterialLexan polycarbonate
      Best suited for
      📋General tuba / euphonium doubler

      Cup Diameter

      The Denis Wick 2.5CC has a cup diameter of 32.00 mm / 1.2598 in compared to 30.99 mm / 1.2201 in on the Kelly 25 — a difference of 1.01 mm / 0.0398 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Denis Wick 2.5CC has a deep cup while the Kelly 25 has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Material

      The Denis Wick 2.5CC is described as unspecified, and the Kelly 25 as Lexan polycarbonate. Material affects mass, warmth, and how quickly the piece responds.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Denis Wick 2.5CC details Kelly 25 details Denis Wick 2.5CC equivalents Kelly 25 equivalents