Denis Wick 2.5CC vs Kelly X-SMALL

The Denis Wick 2.5CC has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick 2.5CC features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Denis Wick 2.5CC
    • Tuba
    Cup diameter32.00 mm / 1.2598 in
    Cup depthDeep
    Rim width7.20 mm / 0.2835 in
    Throat diameter8.60 mm / 0.3386 in
    BackboreV-type
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Kelly X-SMALL
      • Tuba
      Student
      Cup diameter30.73 mm / 1.2098 in
      Cup depthShallow
      Rim width
      Throat diameter
      BackboreS
      Finish
      MaterialLexan polycarbonate
      Best suited for
      📋Student / Eb tuba / euphonium doubler

      Cup Diameter

      The Denis Wick 2.5CC has a cup diameter of 32.00 mm / 1.2598 in compared to 30.73 mm / 1.2098 in on the Kelly X-SMALL — a difference of 1.27 mm / 0.0500 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Denis Wick 2.5CC has a deep cup while the Kelly X-SMALL has a shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Material

      The Denis Wick 2.5CC is described as unspecified, and the Kelly X-SMALL as Lexan polycarbonate. Material affects mass, warmth, and how quickly the piece responds.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Denis Wick 2.5CC details Kelly X-SMALL details Denis Wick 2.5CC equivalents Kelly X-SMALL equivalents