Home › Flugelhorn › Denis Wick 2BFL vs GR Technologies E62FD

Denis Wick 2BFL vs GR Technologies E62FD

The Denis Wick 2BFL has a wider cup diameter.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Denis Wick 2BFL
    • Flugelhorn
    Cup diameter17.00 mm / 0.6693 in
    Cup depthDeep
    Rim width4.92 mm / 0.1937 in
    Throat diameter4.58 mm / 0.1803 in
    Backboreopen
    Finish—
    Material—
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      GR Technologies E62FD
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter15.75 mm / 0.6201 in
      Cup depthDeep
      Rim width—
      Throat diameter—
      Backbore—
      Finish—
      Material—

      Cup Diameter

      The Denis Wick 2BFL has a cup diameter of 17.00 mm / 0.6693 in compared to 15.75 mm / 0.6201 in on the GR Technologies E62FD — a difference of 1.25 mm / 0.0492 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      Both mouthpieces share a deep cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Denis Wick 2BFL details GR Technologies E62FD details Denis Wick 2BFL equivalents GR Technologies E62FD equivalents

      Compare Denis Wick 2BFL with others

      Compare GR Technologies E62FD with others

      Popular Flugelhorn comparisons

      Denis Wick vs GR Technologies

      Browse by specification