Denis Wick 2FL vs GR Technologies 67FD

the Denis Wick 2FL features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Denis Wick 2FL
    • Flugelhorn
    Cup diameter17.00 mm / 0.6693 in
    Cup depthVery deep
    Rim width4.92 mm / 0.1937 in
    Throat diameter4.58 mm / 0.1803 in
    Backboreopen
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      GR Technologies 67FD
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter17.00 mm / 0.6693 in
      Cup depthDeep
      Rim width
      Throat diameter
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone

      Cup Diameter

      Both mouthpieces have virtually identical cup diameters at 17.00 mm / 0.6693 in.

      Cup Depth

      The Denis Wick 2FL has a very deep cup while the GR Technologies 67FD has a deep cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Denis Wick 2FL details GR Technologies 67FD details Denis Wick 2FL equivalents GR Technologies 67FD equivalents