Denis Wick 2L vs Schilke 66

The Denis Wick 2L has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick 2L features a deeper cup, the Denis Wick 2L has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Denis Wick 2L
    • Tuba
    Cup diameter32.00 mm / 1.2598 in
    Cup depthVery deep
    Rim width7.73 mm / 0.3043 in
    Throat diameter8.45 mm / 0.3327 in
    Backboreopen
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Schilke 66
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter31.52 mm / 1.2409 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter8.33 mm / 0.3280 in
      Backbore21/64.3281"
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Denis Wick 2L has a cup diameter of 32.00 mm / 1.2598 in compared to 31.52 mm / 1.2409 in on the Schilke 66 — a difference of 0.48 mm / 0.0189 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Denis Wick 2L has a very deep cup while the Schilke 66 has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Throat Diameter

      The Denis Wick 2L has a wider throat (8.45 mm / 0.3327 in vs 8.33 mm / 0.3280 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Denis Wick 2L details Schilke 66 details Denis Wick 2L equivalents Schilke 66 equivalents