Denis Wick 3BFL vs Denis Wick 4F

The Denis Wick 3BFL has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick 4F features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Denis Wick 3BFL
    • Flugelhorn
    Cup diameter16.75 mm / 0.6594 in
    Cup depthDeep
    Rim width5.05 mm / 0.1988 in
    Throat diameter4.58 mm / 0.1803 in
    Backboreopen
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Denis Wick 4F
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter16.50 mm / 0.6496 in
      Cup depthVery deep
      Rim width5.17 mm / 0.2035 in
      Throat diameter4.58 mm / 0.1803 in
      Backboreopen
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Denis Wick 3BFL has a cup diameter of 16.75 mm / 0.6594 in compared to 16.50 mm / 0.6496 in on the Denis Wick 4F — a difference of 0.25 mm / 0.0098 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Denis Wick 4F has a very deep cup while the Denis Wick 3BFL has a deep cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Throat Diameter

      Throat diameters are essentially identical at 4.58 mm / 0.1803 in, so resistance feel will be comparable.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Denis Wick 3BFL details Denis Wick 4F details Denis Wick 3BFL equivalents Denis Wick 4F equivalents