Denis Wick 3SL vs Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self

The Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self has a wider cup diameter, the Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self features a deeper cup, the Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Denis Wick 3SL
    • Tuba
    Cup diameter31.25 mm / 1.2303 in
    Cup depthShallow
    Rim width8.11 mm / 0.3193 in
    Throat diameter7.62 mm / 0.3000 in
    Backboresmall
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter33.15 mm / 1.3051 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter8.03 mm / 0.3161 in
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self has a cup diameter of 33.15 mm / 1.3051 in compared to 31.25 mm / 1.2303 in on the Denis Wick 3SL — a difference of 1.90 mm / 0.0748 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self has a medium cup while the Denis Wick 3SL has a shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Throat Diameter

      The Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self has a wider throat (8.03 mm / 0.3161 in vs 7.62 mm / 0.3000 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Denis Wick 3SL details Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self details Denis Wick 3SL equivalents Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self equivalents