Denis Wick 4F vs GR Technologies 64.7FL Trudell

The Denis Wick 4F has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick 4F features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Denis Wick 4F
    • Flugelhorn
    Cup diameter16.50 mm / 0.6496 in
    Cup depthVery deep
    Rim width5.17 mm / 0.2035 in
    Throat diameter4.58 mm / 0.1803 in
    Backboreopen
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      GR Technologies 64.7FL Trudell
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter16.43 mm / 0.6469 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      🎵All-round versatile — balanced cup for general playing

      Cup Diameter

      The Denis Wick 4F has a cup diameter of 16.50 mm / 0.6496 in compared to 16.43 mm / 0.6469 in on the GR Technologies 64.7FL Trudell — a difference of 0.07 mm / 0.0028 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Denis Wick 4F has a very deep cup while the GR Technologies 64.7FL Trudell has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Denis Wick 4F details GR Technologies 64.7FL Trudell details Denis Wick 4F equivalents GR Technologies 64.7FL Trudell equivalents