Denis Wick 4F vs Schilke 6F4

The Denis Wick 4F has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick 4F features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Denis Wick 4F
    • Flugelhorn
    Cup diameter16.50 mm / 0.6496 in
    Cup depthVery deep
    Rim width5.17 mm / 0.2035 in
    Throat diameter4.58 mm / 0.1803 in
    Backboreopen
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Schilke 6F4
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter15.99 mm / 0.6295 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter
      Backbore24.1520"
      Finish
      Material

      Cup Diameter

      The Denis Wick 4F has a cup diameter of 16.50 mm / 0.6496 in compared to 15.99 mm / 0.6295 in on the Schilke 6F4 — a difference of 0.51 mm / 0.0201 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Denis Wick 4F has a very deep cup while the Schilke 6F4 has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Denis Wick 4F details Schilke 6F4 details Denis Wick 4F equivalents Schilke 6F4 equivalents