Denis Wick 2F vs Denis Wick 4FL

The Denis Wick 2F has a wider cup diameter.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Denis Wick 2F
    • Flugelhorn
    Cup diameter17.00 mm
    Cup depthVery deep
    Rim width4.92 mm
    Throat diameter4.58 mm
    Backboreopen
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Denis Wick 4FL
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter16.50 mm
      Cup depthVery deep
      Rim width5.17 mm
      Throat diameter4.58 mm
      Backboreopen
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Denis Wick 2F has a cup diameter of 17.00 mm compared to 16.50 mm on the Denis Wick 4FL — a difference of +0.50 mm. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      Both mouthpieces share a very deep cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

      Throat Diameter

      Throat diameters are essentially identical at 4.58 mm, so resistance feel will be comparable.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Denis Wick 2F details Denis Wick 4FL details Denis Wick 2F equivalents Denis Wick 4FL equivalents