Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs Denis Wick 4FL
the Denis Wick 4FL features a deeper cup, the Denis Wick 4FL has a larger throat opening.
Mouthpiece A
Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E
• Flugelhorn
CatalogCup diameter16.50 mm / 0.6496 in
Cup depthShallow
Rim width—
Throat diameter3.50 mm / 0.1378 in
Backbore—
Finish—
Material—
Best suited for
Screamer / high notes — tight throat with shallow cup
vs
Mouthpiece B
Denis Wick 4FL
• Flugelhorn
Cup diameter16.50 mm / 0.6496 in
Cup depthVery deep
Rim width5.17 mm / 0.2035 in
Throat diameter4.58 mm / 0.1803 in
Backboreopen
Finish—
Material—
Best suited for
High-volume projection — open throat for power
Cup Diameter
Both mouthpieces have virtually identical cup diameters at 16.50 mm / 0.6496 in.
Cup Depth
The Denis Wick 4FL has a very deep cup while the Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E has a shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.
Throat Diameter
The Denis Wick 4FL has a wider throat (4.58 mm / 0.1803 in vs 3.50 mm / 0.1378 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.
Which is better?
Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.