Giardinelli 17FL vs GR Technologies 67FL

The GR Technologies 67FL has a wider cup diameter, the Giardinelli 17FL features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Giardinelli 17FL
    • Flugelhorn
    Cup diameter15.00 mm / 0.5906 in
    Cup depthVery deep
    Rim width
    Throat diameter
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      GR Technologies 67FL
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter17.00 mm / 0.6693 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material

      Cup Diameter

      The GR Technologies 67FL has a cup diameter of 17.00 mm / 0.6693 in compared to 15.00 mm / 0.5906 in on the Giardinelli 17FL — a difference of 2.00 mm / 0.0787 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Giardinelli 17FL has a very deep cup while the GR Technologies 67FL has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Giardinelli 17FL details GR Technologies 67FL details Giardinelli 17FL equivalents GR Technologies 67FL equivalents