GR Technologies 63S vs Marcinkiewicz CH 13

The Marcinkiewicz CH 13 has a wider cup diameter, the Marcinkiewicz CH 13 features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    GR Technologies 63S
    • Trumpet
    Cup diameter16.00 mm / 0.6299 in
    Cup depthShallow
    Rim width
    Throat diameter
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    🎺Lead / commercial — shallow cup for brightness and range
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz CH 13
      • Trumpet
      Cup diameter16.31 mm / 0.6421 in
      Cup depthVery deep
      Rim width
      Throat diameter3.66 mm / 0.1441 in
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material

      Cup Diameter

      The Marcinkiewicz CH 13 has a cup diameter of 16.31 mm / 0.6421 in compared to 16.00 mm / 0.6299 in on the GR Technologies 63S — a difference of 0.31 mm / 0.0122 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Marcinkiewicz CH 13 has a very deep cup while the GR Technologies 63S has a shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece GR Technologies 63S details Marcinkiewicz CH 13 details GR Technologies 63S equivalents Marcinkiewicz CH 13 equivalents