GR Technologies 63S vs Schilke 14A4

The Schilke 14A4 has a wider cup diameter, the Schilke 14A4 features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    GR Technologies 63S
    • Trumpet
    Cup diameter16.00 mm / 0.6299 in
    Cup depthShallow
    Rim width
    Throat diameter
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    🎺Lead / commercial — shallow cup for brightness and range
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Schilke 14A4
      • Trumpet
      Cup diameter17.09 mm / 0.6728 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter3.66 mm / 0.1441 in
      Backbore27
      Finish
      Material

      Cup Diameter

      The Schilke 14A4 has a cup diameter of 17.09 mm / 0.6728 in compared to 16.00 mm / 0.6299 in on the GR Technologies 63S — a difference of 1.09 mm / 0.0429 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Schilke 14A4 has a medium cup while the GR Technologies 63S has a shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece GR Technologies 63S details Schilke 14A4 details GR Technologies 63S equivalents Schilke 14A4 equivalents