GR Technologies 66M vs Marcinkiewicz E18E. Miyashiro

The GR Technologies 66M has a wider cup diameter, the Marcinkiewicz E18E. Miyashiro features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    GR Technologies 66M
    • Trumpet
    Cup diameter16.76 mm / 0.6598 in
    Cup depthMedium
    Rim width
    Throat diameter
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz E18E. Miyashiro
      • Trumpet
      Cup diameter16.38 mm / 0.6449 in
      Cup depthVery deep
      Rim width
      Throat diameter3.73 mm / 0.1469 in
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material

      Cup Diameter

      The GR Technologies 66M has a cup diameter of 16.76 mm / 0.6598 in compared to 16.38 mm / 0.6449 in on the Marcinkiewicz E18E. Miyashiro — a difference of 0.38 mm / 0.0150 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Marcinkiewicz E18E. Miyashiro has a very deep cup while the GR Technologies 66M has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece GR Technologies 66M details Marcinkiewicz E18E. Miyashiro details GR Technologies 66M equivalents Marcinkiewicz E18E. Miyashiro equivalents