Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL vs Schilke 20F

The Schilke 20F has a wider cup diameter, the Schilke 20F features a deeper cup, the Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL
    • Flugelhorn
    Cup diameter16.74 mm / 0.6591 in
    Cup depthVery shallow
    Rim width
    Throat diameter4.39 mm / 0.1728 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Schilke 20F
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter17.78 mm / 0.7000 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter3.86 mm / 0.1520 in
      Backbore24 .1520"
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Schilke 20F has a cup diameter of 17.78 mm / 0.7000 in compared to 16.74 mm / 0.6591 in on the Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL — a difference of 1.04 mm / 0.0409 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Schilke 20F has a medium cup while the Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL has a very shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Throat Diameter

      The Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL has a wider throat (4.39 mm / 0.1728 in vs 3.86 mm / 0.1520 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL details Schilke 20F details Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL equivalents Schilke 20F equivalents