Marcinkiewicz 3FLD vs Schilke 20F

The Schilke 20F has a wider cup diameter, the Marcinkiewicz 3FLD has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Marcinkiewicz 3FLD
    • Flugelhorn
    Cup diameter17.25 mm / 0.6791 in
    Cup depthMedium
    Rim width
    Throat diameter4.32 mm / 0.1701 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Schilke 20F
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter17.78 mm / 0.7000 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter3.86 mm / 0.1520 in
      Backbore24 .1520"
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Schilke 20F has a cup diameter of 17.78 mm / 0.7000 in compared to 17.25 mm / 0.6791 in on the Marcinkiewicz 3FLD — a difference of 0.53 mm / 0.0209 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      Both mouthpieces share a medium cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

      Throat Diameter

      The Marcinkiewicz 3FLD has a wider throat (4.32 mm / 0.1701 in vs 3.86 mm / 0.1520 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Marcinkiewicz 3FLD details Schilke 20F details Marcinkiewicz 3FLD equivalents Schilke 20F equivalents