Marcinkiewicz CH 8H BS / 6.5 AL vs Marcinkiewicz CH 8H / 1.6 AL
Both mouthpieces share similar core dimensions — the differences are in the details.
Mouthpiece A
Marcinkiewicz CH 8H BS / 6.5 AL
• Trombone
Cup diameter26.06 mm
Cup depthVery deep
Rim width—
Throat diameter6.76 mm
Backbore—
Finish—
Material—
Best suited for
Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
High-volume projection — open throat for power
vs
Mouthpiece B
Marcinkiewicz CH 8H / 1.6 AL
• Trombone
Cup diameter26.06 mm
Cup depthVery deep
Rim width—
Throat diameter6.76 mm
Backbore—
Finish—
Material—
Best suited for
Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
High-volume projection — open throat for power
Cup Diameter
Both mouthpieces have virtually identical cup diameters at 26.06 mm.
Cup Depth
Both mouthpieces share a very deep cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.
Throat Diameter
Throat diameters are essentially identical at 6.76 mm, so resistance feel will be comparable.
Which is better?
Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.
Compare Marcinkiewicz CH 8H BS / 6.5 AL with others
Compare Marcinkiewicz CH 8H / 1.6 AL with others
Popular Trombone comparisons
- Yamaha SL-YEO-S vs Marcinkiewicz ET3C. Loper
- Giardinelli Sym. T vs Bach 12E
- Bach 12E vs Bob Reeves 5G Gladstone
- Schilke 45B vs Marcinkiewicz ET3C. Loper
- Denis Wick 6BL vs Conn Connstellation 7CW
- Bach 12E vs Bach Mega Tone Trombone 6½A
- Yamaha SL-48DL vs Yamaha SL-YEO-S
- Conn Connstellation 7CW vs Bach 6½A (small shank)