Marcinkiewicz CH 18 vs Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight)

the Marcinkiewicz CH 18 features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Marcinkiewicz CH 18
    • Tuba
    Cup diameter32.77 mm / 1.2902 in
    Cup depthDeep
    Rim width
    Throat diameter8.20 mm / 0.3228 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight)
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material

      Cup Depth

      The Marcinkiewicz CH 18 has a deep cup while the Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Marcinkiewicz CH 18 details Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) details Marcinkiewicz CH 18 equivalents Monette Tuba 94F (Lightweight) equivalents