Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1 vs Marcinkiewicz CH H2

The Marcinkiewicz CH H2 has a wider cup diameter, the Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1 features a deeper cup, the Marcinkiewicz CH H2 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1
    • Tuba
    Cup diameter33.15 mm / 1.3051 in
    Cup depthMedium
    Rim width
    Throat diameter8.03 mm / 0.3161 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz CH H2
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter33.60 mm / 1.3228 in
      Cup depthShallow
      Rim width
      Throat diameter8.33 mm / 0.3280 in
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Marcinkiewicz CH H2 has a cup diameter of 33.60 mm / 1.3228 in compared to 33.15 mm / 1.3051 in on the Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1 — a difference of 0.45 mm / 0.0177 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1 has a medium cup while the Marcinkiewicz CH H2 has a shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Throat Diameter

      The Marcinkiewicz CH H2 has a wider throat (8.33 mm / 0.3280 in vs 8.03 mm / 0.3161 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1 details Marcinkiewicz CH H2 details Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1 equivalents Marcinkiewicz CH H2 equivalents