Marcinkiewicz CH W1 vs Marcinkiewicz CH W1

Both mouthpieces share similar core dimensions — the differences are in the details.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Marcinkiewicz CH W1
    • Tuba
    Cup diameter33.66 mm / 1.3252 in
    Cup depthMedium
    Rim width
    Throat diameter7.67 mm / 0.3020 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz CH W1
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter33.66 mm / 1.3252 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter7.67 mm / 0.3020 in
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      Both mouthpieces have virtually identical cup diameters at 33.66 mm / 1.3252 in.

      Cup Depth

      Both mouthpieces share a medium cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

      Throat Diameter

      Throat diameters are essentially identical at 7.67 mm / 0.3020 in, so resistance feel will be comparable.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Marcinkiewicz CH W1 details Marcinkiewicz CH W1 details Marcinkiewicz CH W1 equivalents Marcinkiewicz CH W1 equivalents