Schilke 29 vs Schilke 32

The Schilke 32 has a wider cup diameter, the Schilke 32 features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Schilke 29
    • French Horn
    Cup diameter17.53 mm / 0.6902 in
    Cup depthShallow
    Rim width
    Throat diameter3.60 mm / 0.1417 in
    Backbore17
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    Screamer / high notes — tight throat with shallow cup
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Schilke 32
      • French Horn
      Cup diameter17.83 mm / 0.7020 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter
      Backbore2
      Finish
      Material

      Cup Diameter

      The Schilke 32 has a cup diameter of 17.83 mm / 0.7020 in compared to 17.53 mm / 0.6902 in on the Schilke 29 — a difference of 0.30 mm / 0.0118 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Schilke 32 has a medium cup while the Schilke 29 has a shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Schilke 29 details Schilke 32 details Schilke 29 equivalents Schilke 32 equivalents