Schilke 30C2 vs Yamaha HR-35C4

The Yamaha HR-35C4 has a wider cup diameter, the Yamaha HR-35C4 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Schilke 30C2
    • French Horn
    Cup diameter17.03 mm / 0.6705 in
    Cup depthMedium
    Rim width
    Throat diameter3.56 mm / 0.1402 in
    Backbore13
    Finish
    Material
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Yamaha HR-35C4
      • French Horn
      Cup diameter18.08 mm / 0.7118 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter3.98 mm / 0.1567 in
      BackboreStandard
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Yamaha HR-35C4 has a cup diameter of 18.08 mm / 0.7118 in compared to 17.03 mm / 0.6705 in on the Schilke 30C2 — a difference of 1.05 mm / 0.0413 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      Both mouthpieces share a medium cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

      Throat Diameter

      The Yamaha HR-35C4 has a wider throat (3.98 mm / 0.1567 in vs 3.56 mm / 0.1402 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Schilke 30C2 details Yamaha HR-35C4 details Schilke 30C2 equivalents Yamaha HR-35C4 equivalents