Bach 22 vs Schilke 66

The Bach 22 has a wider cup diameter.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bach 22
    • Tuba
    Cup diameter31.60 mm / 1.2441 in
    Cup depthMedium
    Rim width
    Throat diameter8.33 mm / 0.3280 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Schilke 66
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter31.52 mm / 1.2409 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter8.33 mm / 0.3280 in
      Backbore21/64.3281"
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Bach 22 has a cup diameter of 31.60 mm / 1.2441 in compared to 31.52 mm / 1.2409 in on the Schilke 66 — a difference of 0.08 mm / 0.0031 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      Both mouthpieces share a medium cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

      Throat Diameter

      Throat diameters are essentially identical at 8.33 mm / 0.3280 in, so resistance feel will be comparable.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bach 22 details Schilke 66 details Bach 22 equivalents Schilke 66 equivalents