Bruno Tilz 210-C 32 vs Denis Wick 2FL

The Denis Wick 2FL has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick 2FL features a deeper cup, the Denis Wick 2FL has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-C 32
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Cup diameter16.80 mm / 0.6614 in
    Cup depthMedium
    Rim width
    Throat diameter4.50 mm / 0.1772 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Denis Wick 2FL
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter17.00 mm / 0.6693 in
      Cup depthVery deep
      Rim width4.92 mm / 0.1937 in
      Throat diameter4.58 mm / 0.1803 in
      Backboreopen
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Denis Wick 2FL has a cup diameter of 17.00 mm / 0.6693 in compared to 16.80 mm / 0.6614 in on the Bruno Tilz 210-C 32 — a difference of 0.20 mm / 0.0079 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Denis Wick 2FL has a very deep cup while the Bruno Tilz 210-C 32 has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Throat Diameter

      The Denis Wick 2FL has a wider throat (4.58 mm / 0.1803 in vs 4.50 mm / 0.1772 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-C 32 details Denis Wick 2FL details Bruno Tilz 210-C 32 equivalents Denis Wick 2FL equivalents