Bruno Tilz 210-C 32 vs Giardinelli 17FL

The Bruno Tilz 210-C 32 has a wider cup diameter, the Giardinelli 17FL features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-C 32
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Cup diameter16.80 mm / 0.6614 in
    Cup depthMedium
    Rim width
    Throat diameter4.50 mm / 0.1772 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Giardinelli 17FL
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter15.00 mm / 0.5906 in
      Cup depthVery deep
      Rim width
      Throat diameter
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material

      Cup Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 210-C 32 has a cup diameter of 16.80 mm / 0.6614 in compared to 15.00 mm / 0.5906 in on the Giardinelli 17FL — a difference of 1.80 mm / 0.0709 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Giardinelli 17FL has a very deep cup while the Bruno Tilz 210-C 32 has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-C 32 details Giardinelli 17FL details Bruno Tilz 210-C 32 equivalents Giardinelli 17FL equivalents