Home › Flugelhorn › Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 vs GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida

Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 vs GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida

The Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 has a wider cup diameter.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-S 12
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Cup diameter17.00 mm / 0.6693 in
    Cup depth
    Rim width—
    Throat diameter3.90 mm / 0.1535 in
    Backbore—
    Finish—
    Material—
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter16.89 mm / 0.6650 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width—
      Throat diameter—
      Backbore—
      Finish—
      Material—

      Cup Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 has a cup diameter of 17.00 mm / 0.6693 in compared to 16.89 mm / 0.6650 in on the GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida — a difference of 0.11 mm / 0.0043 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 details GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida details Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 equivalents GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida equivalents

      Compare Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 with others

      Compare GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida with others

      Popular Flugelhorn comparisons

      Bruno Tilz vs GR Technologies

      Browse by specification