Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 vs GR Technologies G66FD Radtke

The Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 has a wider cup diameter.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-S 12
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Cup diameter17.00 mm / 0.6693 in
    Cup depth
    Rim width
    Throat diameter3.90 mm / 0.1535 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      GR Technologies G66FD Radtke
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter16.76 mm / 0.6598 in
      Cup depthDeep
      Rim width
      Throat diameter
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material

      Cup Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 has a cup diameter of 17.00 mm / 0.6693 in compared to 16.76 mm / 0.6598 in on the GR Technologies G66FD Radtke — a difference of 0.24 mm / 0.0094 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 details GR Technologies G66FD Radtke details Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 equivalents GR Technologies G66FD Radtke equivalents