Bruno Tilz 211-58 vs Schilke 30C2
The Schilke 30C2 has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 211-58 has a larger throat opening.
Mouthpiece A
Bruno Tilz 211-58
• French Horn
CatalogCup diameter17.00 mm
Cup depthMedium
Rim width—
Throat diameter3.90 mm
Backbore—
Finish—
Material—
Best suited for
High-volume projection — open throat for power
vs
Mouthpiece B
Schilke 30C2
• French Horn
Cup diameter17.03 mm
Cup depthMedium
Rim width—
Throat diameter3.56 mm
Backbore13
Finish—
Material—
Cup Diameter
The Schilke 30C2 has a cup diameter of 17.03 mm compared to 17.00 mm on the Bruno Tilz 211-58 — a difference of +0.03 mm. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.
Cup Depth
Both mouthpieces share a medium cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.
Throat Diameter
The Bruno Tilz 211-58 has a wider throat (3.90 mm vs 3.56 mm). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.
Which is better?
Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.