Bruno Tilz 310-M 29 vs Schilke 67
The Bruno Tilz 310-M 29 has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 310-M 29 features a deeper cup, the Bruno Tilz 310-M 29 has a larger throat opening.
Cup Diameter
The Bruno Tilz 310-M 29 has a cup diameter of 32.50 mm / 1.2795 in compared to 32.41 mm / 1.2760 in on the Schilke 67 — a difference of 0.09 mm / 0.0035 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.
Cup Depth
The Bruno Tilz 310-M 29 has a deep cup while the Schilke 67 has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.
Throat Diameter
The Bruno Tilz 310-M 29 has a wider throat (8.40 mm / 0.3307 in vs 8.33 mm / 0.3280 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.
Which is better?
Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.