GR Technologies G66FD Radtke vs GR Technologies 67FD

The GR Technologies 67FD has a wider cup diameter.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    GR Technologies G66FD Radtke
    • Flugelhorn
    Cup diameter16.76 mm / 0.6598 in
    Cup depthDeep
    Rim width
    Throat diameter
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      GR Technologies 67FD
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter17.00 mm / 0.6693 in
      Cup depthDeep
      Rim width
      Throat diameter
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone

      Cup Diameter

      The GR Technologies 67FD has a cup diameter of 17.00 mm / 0.6693 in compared to 16.76 mm / 0.6598 in on the GR Technologies G66FD Radtke — a difference of 0.24 mm / 0.0094 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      Both mouthpieces share a deep cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece GR Technologies G66FD Radtke details GR Technologies 67FD details GR Technologies G66FD Radtke equivalents GR Technologies 67FD equivalents