Marcinkiewicz CH 18 vs Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1

The Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1 has a wider cup diameter, the Marcinkiewicz CH 18 features a deeper cup, the Marcinkiewicz CH 18 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Marcinkiewicz CH 18
    • Tuba
    Cup diameter32.77 mm / 1.2902 in
    Cup depthDeep
    Rim width
    Throat diameter8.20 mm / 0.3228 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter33.15 mm / 1.3051 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter8.03 mm / 0.3161 in
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1 has a cup diameter of 33.15 mm / 1.3051 in compared to 32.77 mm / 1.2902 in on the Marcinkiewicz CH 18 — a difference of 0.38 mm / 0.0150 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Marcinkiewicz CH 18 has a deep cup while the Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1 has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Throat Diameter

      The Marcinkiewicz CH 18 has a wider throat (8.20 mm / 0.3228 in vs 8.03 mm / 0.3161 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Marcinkiewicz CH 18 details Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1 details Marcinkiewicz CH 18 equivalents Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1 equivalents